Citation-friendly pages
WEAKTwo blog posts compare UAN with UAN + S and ATS with KTS and CaTs. We found no best-of, alternatives or pricing-style pages among the URLs we fetched.
3 pages analysed for AI-writing patterns.
61/100
AI-HEAVY
Scored 61/100 across 3 pages. The content reads AI-heavy: formulaic structure, multiple categories of tells (15 flagged), and no consistent editorial voice. A core update is likely to demote these pages.
HOW THE SCORE WORKS
0-40
Human
Voice, specifics, edits visible.
41-60
Mixed
Some shape, several tells per page.
61-80
AI-heavy
Formulaic. Demoted on next core update.
81-100
Fully AI
Em dashes, stock openers, repetition.
01/blog/uan-vs-uan-s/567 words · 6 em dashes · 3 tells60
/blog/uan-vs-uan-s/
567 words · 6 em dashes · 3 tells
- OTHER
“UAN е възможност, когато планираме азотно хранене. UAN + S е възможност, когато програмата включва едновременно азот и сяра.”
Parallel, formulaic two-sentence structure with a vague 'is an option' framing; mildly templated LLM rhythm.
- OTHER
“Следователно замяната тон за тон променя храненето.”
Generic connective conclusion sentence that restates the point; slightly formulaic.
- OTHER
“Конкретната норма, моментът и начинът на внасяне се съобразяват с културата, фазата и условията.”
Rule-of-three hedged generality with no specific detail, typical of LLM-style safe filler.
02/blog/uan-vs-uan-s/611 words · 6 em dashes · 6 tells60
/blog/uan-vs-uan-s/
611 words · 6 em dashes · 6 tells
- EM DASH
“Both fertilizers contain nitrogen in three forms — amide, ammonium and nitrate.”
Unedited em dash used as a clause separator where a colon or comma would do.
- EM DASH
“UAN + S combines urea, ammonium nitrate and ammonium thiosulphate — ATS.”
Another em dash introducing an abbreviation, a typical LLM habit.
- EM DASH
“Total nitrogen — N”
Em dash in a table label; the page uses the same pattern again for sulphur, which suggests a template.
- STOCK PHRASE
“When choosing a liquid fertilizer, the key question is which nutrients the crop needs.”
Generic framing opener typical of LLM intros.
- REPETITION
“UAN is an option when planning nitrogen nutrition. UAN + S is an option when the programme includes both nitrogen and sulphur.”
Mirrored sentence templates that stay vague and give no real recommendation.
- OTHER
“Replacing one product with the other tonne for tonne therefore changes the nutrient supply.”
Over-explained conclusion with a formulaic 'therefore' that restates the preceding calculation.
03/blog/ats-kts-cats/695 words · 9 em dashes · 6 tells62
/blog/ats-kts-cats/
695 words · 9 em dashes · 6 tells
- EM DASH
“При ATS това е азотът , при KTS — калият , а при CaTs — калцият”
Two em dashes in the lead sentence replace commas or a repeated verb, a typical unedited LLM clause separator.
- EM DASH
“калият в KTS е изразен като K₂O, а калцият в CaTs — като Ca”
Another mid-sentence em dash as an elision marker; the page uses nine in total, including the table.
- STOCK PHRASE
“CaTs доставя калций и сяра като част от цялостна програма за хранене.”
Generic 'as part of a holistic program' filler that says nothing specific about the product.
- VACUOUS TRANSITION
“Следователно еднаквото количество продукт доставя различни количества сяра и различен съпътстващ елемент.”
'Следователно' opens a conclusion that restates the table, and the sentence repeats the same idea twice.
- REPETITION
“Вижте характеристиките на ATS.”
The same 'see the characteristics of X' call-to-action ends each of the three product sections in identical form.
- OTHER
“Подходящите количества и моменти на внасяне се определят според културата, фазата, нуждата от калций и анализа на почвата или растенията.”
Over-hedged, generic 'it depends' list that avoids giving any specific guidance.